At 4:48 PM -0400 5/03/2000, Gerald G. Weichbrodt wrote: >Hi all. Is it generally considered bad HTML form to have a hypertext link >in a document that goes right to an image? It seems to me that such links >generally go to an image that's complex enough that the author intended to >fill the whole screen with it, and yet I can't think how one would provide a >text-accessible description for such an image if the image isn't contained >in anything. Is this a reasonable way to think about this issue? Yes, a "raw image" linked from a page has accessibility problems; if you create even a minimal HTML page "wrapper" around it, you can add alternative text and other information. -- -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2000 17:07:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:48 GMT