- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:20:32 -0500
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, AG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 06/03/2018 12:28, Michael Cooper wrote: > Here is the detailed timeline we have set up to manage our progress to > Recommendation: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_timeline/Details The timeline has the AC review starting in PR, but unless I'm missing something, the 2018 Process says this should be triggered at CR [1]https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#maturity-levels. From 6.1.2: "A Candidate Recommendation is a document that satisfies the technical requirements of the Working Group that produced it and their dependencies, or makes substantive corrections to a Recommendation that is not maintained by a Working Group, and has already received wide review. W3C publishes a Candidate Recommendation to - signal to the wider community that it is time to do a final review - gather implementation experience - begin formal review by the Advisory Committee, who may recommend that the document be published as a W3C Recommendation, returned to the Working Group for further work, or abandoned. - Provide an exclusion opportunity per the W3C Patent Policy. Note: A Candidate Recommendation under this process corresponds to the "Last Call Working Draft" discussed in the Patent Policy." It goes on: "A Proposed Recommendation is a document that has been accepted by the W3C Director as of sufficient quality to become a W3C Recommendation. This phase establishes a deadline for the Advisory Committee review that begins with Candidate Recommendation. Substantive changes must not be made to a Proposed Recommendation except by publishing a new Working Draft or Candidate Recommendation." Léonie [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#maturity-levels > > Michael > > -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2018 19:21:21 UTC