- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:08:21 +0000
- To: "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The critical phrases are: "may be necessary to pursue", and: "possibly
on the horizon". I understand why things were phrased that way, but the
result is that there was no concrete commitment to 2.2, and so people
weren't sure they could count on it.
AWK: I believe that the WG was very clear that we were switching to a regular cadence, so people can count on another update, even if the decision as to whether it is WCAG 2.2 or Silver couldn’t be made.
On balance, I think that our current course this will prove to be the
best one we could have chosen.
I think it was the right choice too. I also acknowledge it was never
going to be an easy thing to accomplish, and I think you and Josh have
done an admirable job of steering the WG through these choppy waters.
AWK: Much appreciated, and your comments and support are appreciated now as they have been throughout this process to date.
Thanks,
AWK
Received on Friday, 26 January 2018 22:08:49 UTC