- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:02:26 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 18/01/2018 15:03, John Foliot wrote: > +1, with an additional add-on to Alastair's comment. (Q: is the > CSS transition-timing-function - aka "ease-in, out > <https://css-tricks.com/ease-out-in-ease-in-out/>" considered > 'animation'? - For the Understanding document, which currently doesn't > speak to this that I can see...) ease-in/ease-out only make sense when the duration of the transition is greater than zero, i.e. there are motion animation steps (it doesn't just jump from step one to the final step in one fell swoop of duration 0). Ergo, regardless of how it's achieved, if there's more than an immediate jump from one state to another (whether it's a CSS transition, or uses JavaScript, of jQuery, or SMIL, or...) it counts as an animation and is covered by the language. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 19:02:54 UTC