Re[2]: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input...

>On 17/01/2018 09:23, Detlev Fischer (TK) wrote:
>>Hi Patrick,
>>
>>I guess you meant to say
>>
>>"UNLESS the user has a mechanism to zoom, the following must be true"
>>
>>...or (which is the same thing essentially)
>>
>>"IF the user doesn't have a mechanism to zoom, the following must be 
>>true"
>>
>>Correct?
>
>Yes, got wrapped up in an unintententional double negative there.
>
>>I think adding this exception would largely pull the rug from under 
>>this SC since nearly all UA (or mobile OS, in their accessibility 
>>settings) allow some form of zoom - so you would have a SC which you 
>>can in most cases ignore (or which would have as only technique for 
>>authors something like "Do not prevent the user from zooming by 
>>setting meta name=viewport maximum-scale=1", or similar).
>
>You saw through my evil plan, yes.
Alles klar :-)

>
>
>P
>-- Patrick H. Lauke
>
>www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:40:30 UTC