W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC

From: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:04:18 -0400
Message-Id: <1807AB63-8F2E-42C7-8933-258816AAFC14@umd.edu>
Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
hmmm

ok as long as you define a line of text.   Else I might look at a line of word wrapped text — and think you mean the whole line including the wrapped part — which indeed might require scrolling if the line is long enough and the screen small. 

not sure how to clear up that ambiguity but other wiser seems to work.   maybe just add single? 

Content can be resized to 400% without loss of content or functionality, and in a way that does not require the user to scroll to read a single line of text, with the exception of any part of the content where fixed spatial layout is essential to the information being conveyed. 


g 

Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu




> On May 8, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> To adjust the text, I’d suggest:
> “Content can be resized to 400% without loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in the direction of text except for parts of the content where fixed spatial layout is necessary to use or meaning.”
> 
> Cribbing from 1.4.8, I think that we can keep it simple and say "in a way that does not require the user to scroll to read a line of text"
> 
> How about:
> Content can be resized to 400% without loss of content or functionality, and in a way that does not require the user to scroll to read a line of text, with the exception of any part of the content where fixed spatial layout is essential to the information being conveyed. 
> 
> AWK
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 19:04:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 08:04:10 UTC