Using more robust failures to support existing SCs

Hi all,

In the last thread - some interesting comments from Detlev and Jon A, 
got me thinking and I want to give a +1. I agree with Detlev and Jon and 
think this is a clever approach to providing better support for existing 
SCs, by having more and varied failures.

Thanks

Josh

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 16:13:06 UTC