w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2015 by author

Adam Solomon

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Friday, 23 October)

ALAN SMITH

• RE: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)

Alice

• T.V.L. Global, Not Only Logistics, Also Your Reliable Partner in China (Tuesday, 29 December)

Alistair Garrison

• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Fwd: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Re: CfC: Issue 113 (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: The examples for aria-expanded differ in the Wiki.... (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• CfC: Issue 113 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Monday, 14 December)
• CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG (Friday, 11 December)
• CfC: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CfC on Issue 102 (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• No meeting 8 Dec 2015 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Friday, 4 December)
• CfC on Issue 102 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: CfC: Extension Requirements (Thursday, 3 December)
• CfC: Extension Requirements (Thursday, 3 December)
• CfC: Extension Requirements (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Wednesday, 25 November)
• CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource (Monday, 16 November)
• WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 (Friday, 13 November)
• CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 10 November)
• WCAG Agenda November 10, 2015 (Monday, 9 November)
• QuickRef approval for public review (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation (Friday, 16 October)
• Publishing an Editing Recommendation (Thursday, 8 October)
• WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 (Friday, 2 October)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 21 2014 (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 (Tuesday, 6 October)

Can Wang

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 29 October)

Cherie Ekholm

• WCAG change (Friday, 23 October)

Coralie Mercier

• Fwd: The examples for aria-expanded differ in the Wiki.... (Wednesday, 16 December)

David MacDonald

• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• coming... just installed new comptuer (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Review of Open Ajax Alliance WCAG RULE Checks (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• i guess no meeting today (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: 48-Hour Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish MAUR as W3C Note (Monday, 12 October)
• interesting Nielsen article on flat design for cognitive team (Friday, 2 October)

Deborah Dahl

• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)

Detlev Fischer

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)

EA Draffan

• RE: reCAPTCHA Accessibility reVISTED (Tuesday, 15 December)
• RE: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 (Friday, 6 November)
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Monday, 2 November)
• RE: COGA SC rewrite (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Sunday, 25 October)
• RE: Whta COGA is doing with personlization - was Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)

Eric Eggert

• Re: Draft Minutes for November 17, 2015 Meeting (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 (Wednesday, 7 October)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Open Issue #102 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: COGA SC rewrite (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: 2 proposed resolutions. (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)

Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Open Issue #102 (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)

Gunderson, Jon R

• RE: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)

Herin Hentry

• Re: Call for Review: How to Meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference (Thursday, 19 November)

Hoffman, Allen

• RE: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Monday, 2 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Monday, 2 November)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: HTML for markup and CSS for presentation: valid? (Thursday, 1 October)

James Nurthen

• Re: Contrast of focused item (options) in select element (Tuesday, 20 October)

james.nurthen@oracle.com

• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)

Jens Oliver Meiert

• Re: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)

Jim Allan

• Re: Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Contrast of focused item (options) in select element (Wednesday, 21 October)

John Foliot

• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Issue 113 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• RE: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)

Jonathan Avila

• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• HTML editing TF (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: No action needed. Just discussion (Tuesday, 1 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• WCAG WG Draft Minutes November 10, 2015 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• RE: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)
• Results from a WCAG 2.0 survey from Universidad de Alcalá (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Script-Based Web Accessibility Proposal - Web Accessibility Actions (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Contrast of focused item (options) in select element (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

josh@interaccess.ie

• Re: HTML editing TF (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re[2]: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1, F91 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 5 December)
• WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re[2]: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Wednesday, 25 November)
• WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 10, 2015 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• !Important: Quickef survey - Gentle reminder (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re[2]: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)
• No WCAG meeting next week (27th Oct) (Friday, 23 October)
• No WCAG meeting next week (27th Oct) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re[2]: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Friday, 9 October)

Joshue O Connor

• WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Re[2]: Do SCs need to be testable? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Monday, 2 November)
• WCAG Agenda November 3rd, 2015 (Sunday, 1 November)
• Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 29 October)
• Method for minting new Success Criteria (Thursday, 29 October)
• COGA SC rewrite (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Script-Based Web Accessibility Proposal - Web Accessibility Actions (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: i guess no meeting today (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Extension levels (Friday, 16 October)
• Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Friday, 16 October)
• No WCAG meeting 20th Oct 2015 (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Kathy Wahlbin

• RE: Issue 113 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• RE: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• RE: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 23 November)

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL

• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 (Tuesday, 1 December)

Kenny Zhang

• Re: WCAG Agenda December 15th 2015 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 (Tuesday, 6 October)

Kurt Mattes

• Re: Open Issue #102 (Thursday, 3 December)

Laura Carlson

• Meeting Minutes December 15, 2015 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• reCAPTCHA Accessibility reVISTED (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Introduction (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Meeting Minutes November 3, 2015 (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Publishing an Editing Recommendation (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Extension levels (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)

lisa.seeman

• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• as a side note (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 26 October)
• 2 proposed resolutions. (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Whta COGA is doing with personlization - was Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)

Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)

Marc Johlic

• Minutes from WCAG 1st December, 2015 meeting (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Michael Cooper

• Editorial changes to extensions Re: WCAG Agenda November 24th, 2015 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Meeting password for WCAG meeting in WebEx changed (Monday, 23 November)

Michael Pluke

• RE: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Saturday, 7 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Saturday, 7 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 5 November)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)

Michiel Bijl

• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Error Handling Best Practice? (Thursday, 17 December)

Mike Elledge

• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: The <pre> element (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Open Issue #102 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Open Issue #102 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 23 November)
• Draft Minutes for November 17, 2015 Meeting (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Moe Kraft

• Re: WCAG Agenda November 17, 2015 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Regrets: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Paul Adam

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)

Rochford, John

• RE: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)
• RE: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)

Sailesh Panchang

• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CfC: Issue 122 (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Friday, 20 November)
• Forwarding explanation of "available in text" in SC 1.3.1 (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: COGA SC rewrite (Friday, 30 October)
• Extensions: have a 'MonoSpec' extension? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Clarifying concept of extension (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: HTML for markup and CSS for presentation: valid? (Thursday, 1 October)

Sarah Horton

• Re: WCAG Agenda 1st December, 2015 (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Introduction (Tuesday, 17 November)

Shawn Henry

• Call for Review: How to Meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference (Tuesday, 17 November)

Srinivasu Chakravarthula

• Re: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: WCAG Agenda October 6, 2015 (Tuesday, 6 October)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Should techniques move to HTML5? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: The <pre> element (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: GitHub issue on checkbox and radio button labels (Thursday, 19 November)

Wayne Dick

• Re: Issue 122 (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC: Minor change to Image Tutorial requested by EOWG (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: No meeting 8 Dec 2015 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• No action needed. Just discussion (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: CfC: Public Draft version of How to Meet WCAG resource (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Method for minting new Success Criteria (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Using more robust failures to support existing SCs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Friday, 23 October)
• Structure vs. Value and Contradictory Criteria (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Regrets: WCAG Agenda October 13th 2015 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• WCAG MinutesOctober 6, 2015 (Tuesday, 6 October)

wcan

• Re: Extension conflict/compatibility requirement (Thursday, 29 October)

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker

• WCAG-ACTION-317: Send note to list on 102 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/102 for comments and see if this can just be closed (Tuesday, 1 December)
• WCAG-ACTION-316: Send a quick pointer to aria to take a look at this https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/113 (Tuesday, 1 December)

White, Jason J

• Re: CfC: Checkbox and Radio button labels and 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Do SCs need to be testable? (Thursday, 5 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2015 00:26:31 UTC