W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2014

RE: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques

From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:03:44 +0000
To: Aurélien Levy <aurelien.levy@temesis.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <323C3CDA661E2E489F372903A1B2A7946C3FFB58@DEWDFEMB10C.global.corp.sap>
I also found yet http://www.deque.com/deque-fireeyes

www.tanaguru.com is not responding ... 

We need VERY recent links AND an evaluation + feature comparison.


-----Original Message-----
From: Aurélien Levy [mailto:aurelien.levy@temesis.com] 
Sent: Freitag, 5. September 2014 09:57
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques


in France we have at least two :
reporting.opquast.com and www.tanaguru.com

In Us, i think that tools of deque and hisoftware are doing that too

> Hi Christophe,
> which validators + accessibility validators do currently check using the *client-side browser DOM* and *not* server-side generated or static html? For instance, W3C Validator relies on protocols and *cannot* do this.
> I know e.g.  HTML Validator plugin for Firefox that can do this client-side: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/new_install4.html but validating an entire site with it is tedious since IMO there is no crawling mechanism integrated.
> Do you have a complete list of alternatives?
> Regards
> Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Strobbe [mailto:strobbe@hdm-stuttgart.de]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 15:49
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques
> On 4/09/2014 13:34, Joshue O Connor wrote:
>> #http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140902/G134.html
>> The Peter Kranz link to 'Validating an entire site' is moved from
>> http://www.standards-schmandards.com/?2005/04/10/18-massvalidate
>> to
>> http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/
>> NOTE: Some of the validators are looking very old - and some articles
>> are over 10 years old also.
> Ah, validators. I know who collected those links ;-)
> The link to STG XML Validation Form leads to an Error 404 and I can't
> find a replacement on Brown University's website.
> The URL for XML Nanny now leads to a site in Japanese that is apparently
> not about XML validation. (There is a tool called "XML Nanny" for
> validating XML and XHTML in the Mac App Store:
> <https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/xml-nanny/id423791387?mt=12>.)
>> The link to 'XHTML-Schemata für FrontPage 2003 und Visual Studio .NET'
>> should have the text 'XHTML-Schemata für FrontPage 2003 und Visual
>> Studio .NET [In German]' included in the URI.
>> '<a>Nvu</a> is a free and open-source Web authoring tool for Windows,'
>> should be
>> '<a>Nvu is a free and open-source Web authoring tool</a> for Windows,'.
> Nvu was discontinued some time ago; its successor was Kompozer
> <http://kompozer.net/>, which had its most recent release in ... 2010.
> With regard to XML editors:
> * The link to SCREEM can be removed; the project has been inactive for
> several years now.
> * There have been no xerlin releases since 2005 (though the program may
> still work (it's in Java).
> Best regards,
> Christophe
>> Including useful keywords in the Amaya link (an links to remaining XML
>> editors) would also be useful for screen reader users.
>> (...)

Aurélien Levy
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 08:04:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:16 UTC