RE: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques

> I also found yet http://www.deque.com/deque-fireeyes



The AMP toolbar for Firefox<https://www.ssbbartgroup.com/reference/index.php/AMP_Toolbar_for_Firefox#Installing_the_Toolbar> also provides for client-side accessibility testing of the DOM and headless crawler based browser testing via AMP.  A free login is required for AMP to access the toolbar.  Some non-toolbar AMP features require a subscription.



Jonathan



-----Original Message-----
From: Schnabel, Stefan [mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 4:04 AM
To: Aurélien Levy; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques



I also found yet http://www.deque.com/deque-fireeyes



www.tanaguru.com<http://www.tanaguru.com> is not responding ...



We need VERY recent links AND an evaluation + feature comparison.



Regards

Stefan



-----Original Message-----

From: Aurélien Levy [mailto:aurelien.levy@temesis.com]

Sent: Freitag, 5. September 2014 09:57

To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and Techniques



Hi,



in France we have at least two :

reporting.opquast.com and www.tanaguru.com<http://www.tanaguru.com>



In Us, i think that tools of deque and hisoftware are doing that too



Regards,

Aurélien

> Hi Christophe,

>

> which validators + accessibility validators do currently check using the *client-side browser DOM* and *not* server-side generated or static html? For instance, W3C Validator relies on protocols and *cannot* do this.

>

> I know e.g.  HTML Validator plugin for Firefox that can do this client-side: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/new_install4.html but validating an entire site with it is tedious since IMO there is no crawling mechanism integrated.

>

> Do you have a complete list of alternatives?

>

> Regards

> Stefan

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Christophe Strobbe [mailto:strobbe@hdm-stuttgart.de]

> Sent: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 15:49

> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

> Subject: Re: Broken Links and Redirects in Understanding and

> Techniques

>

>

> On 4/09/2014 13:34, Joshue O Connor wrote:

>> #http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140902/G134.html

>> The Peter Kranz link to 'Validating an entire site' is moved from

>> http://www.standards-schmandards.com/?2005/04/10/18-massvalidate

>>

>> to

>>

>> http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/

>>

>> NOTE: Some of the validators are looking very old - and some articles

>> are over 10 years old also.

> Ah, validators. I know who collected those links ;-)

>

> The link to STG XML Validation Form leads to an Error 404 and I can't

> find a replacement on Brown University's website.

>

> The URL for XML Nanny now leads to a site in Japanese that is

> apparently not about XML validation. (There is a tool called "XML

> Nanny" for validating XML and XHTML in the Mac App Store:

> <https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/xml-nanny/id423791387?mt=12>.)

>

>> The link to 'XHTML-Schemata für FrontPage 2003 und Visual Studio .NET'

>> should have the text 'XHTML-Schemata für FrontPage 2003 und Visual

>> Studio .NET [In German]' included in the URI.

>>

>> '<a>Nvu</a> is a free and open-source Web authoring tool for Windows,'

>> should be

>> '<a>Nvu is a free and open-source Web authoring tool</a> for Windows,'.

> Nvu was discontinued some time ago; its successor was Kompozer

> <http://kompozer.net/>, which had its most recent release in ... 2010.

>

> With regard to XML editors:

> * The link to SCREEM can be removed; the project has been inactive for

> several years now.

> * There have been no xerlin releases since 2005 (though the program

> may still work (it's in Java).

>

> Best regards,

>

> Christophe

>

>> Including useful keywords in the Amaya link (an links to remaining

>> XML

>> editors) would also be useful for screen reader users.

>> (...)

>>

>





--

Aurélien Levy

----

Temesis