- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:06:30 -0400
- To: "'Sailesh Panchang'" <spanchang02@yahoo.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'508'" <508@access-board.gov>
Yes that's a good point Sailesh, Processes should be considered... I like your post Christophe good distinction between widgets and pages... David -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang Sent: July-05-11 9:31 AM To: 'WCAG'; '508' Subject: RE: date pickers >However, looking up our definition for functionality gives us: >�processes and outcomes achievable through user action�� >I think the operative word is �outcome�. The outcome is to book a ticket >(or whatever else), and the text box allows that. � Sailesh: That is merely wishful thinking. Why should outcome be the operative word? What are the grounds for excluding processes? If you read it carefully it says "PROCESSES AND". Then an e-retail site can place a phone# on their Web page and tell PWD to call that # and place their orders ... The process is immaterial... they still get the outcome of ordering the product or service. Sailesh
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 17:07:02 UTC