W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Revised Conformance section for WCAG

From: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <697571.24185.qm@web38706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Jason,
Yes I agree  to your editorial change. Thanks for
that. But first I hope the "suggested wording" is
accepted.
Sailesh

--- Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote:

> 
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:41:25PM -0700, Sailesh
> Panchang wrote:
> > Suggested wording:
> > When a series of Web pages present sequential
> steps 
> > that need to be completed in order to accomplish a
> > task (or an activity), conformance at a particular
> > level  may be claimed only if all Web pages in the
> > series conform at that  level. 
> > ===
> 
> Editorial comment: substitute "attained" for
> "claimed". This part of the
> Conformance section is not concerned with whether
> claims can be made, but with
> whether or not Web pages conform (at a given level).
> I think the requirements
> should therefore be stated in terms of conformance
> itself rather than in terms
> of conformance claims.
> 
> 
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 18:06:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT