W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: [Bug 1793] xml report: outline

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:13:29 +0100
To: <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: <ot@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200611020010265.SM04908@Inbox>

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Johannes Koch"<koch@w3development.de>
    Inviato: 01/11/06 23.20.42
    A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Cc: "ot@w3.org"<ot@w3.org>
    Oggetto: Re: [Bug 1793] xml report: outline
    Sorry, but if this is really the situation, this part of the italian law 
    seems silly to me. How can a government make a law that requires a 
    specific feature of a software, that the government can not guarantee to 
    be stable forever? And why is it not allowed to check the outline with a 
    different tool?
It is a misunderstanding.
You can check with everything you want but it was the suggested tool due is a w3c official tool: no worry, there will be other tools, but i hope w3c validator don't made same end of Amaya...
As developer (since about 20 years) I've always seen that features are removed - if moved in other tools - when the new tool works, and now the new tool don't works.

Is too much to know why projects that also I indirectly pay take these decisions? I'm also waiting to know who contact to make this implementation by our developers for don't delay precious time of the w3c-beta-next-generation tools producers.
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 05:13:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:01 UTC