W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:15:37 +0200
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060504210214.02c5c7b0@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Hi Chris,

At 20:51 4/05/2006, Chris Ridpath wrote:

>(...) There are several blocks of text in the technique that describe what 
>to do but they are all a bit different.
>
>The (X)HTML examples refer to DTDs and validators but the tests, as you 
>pointed out, do not.

That is because DTDs and validators are a quick and easy way to make these 
checks. If you know other ways, please let me know. I now realise I forgot 
to check if Tidy and JTidy can be used here.

>  The title of the technique implies that a DTD is necessary and 
> validation is required.

As Gregg has pointed out, we may have to fix the title.
However, I don't understand why you think that the title implies that a DTD 
is necessary. "Necessary" in what sense?
- For this technique, it is necessary to have a DTD or other documentation 
that specifies which attributes have ID values, but since this is a 
technique for HTML, this is not a problem.
- For this technique, it is not necessary to specify a document type 
declaration, but it helps.
- For this technique, it is not necessary to validate against a DTD, but it 
is a quick and easy way to see if you satisfy the technique. However, 
validation is clearly a stricter requirement. So, in a validation report, 
you would look only for errors related to ID values and the use of opening 
and closing tags.


>So is this technique the same as H74 (you need to be well formed with 
>unique IDs) or is it different (you need a DTD and validation)?

I suppose you mean H75. H74 is the non-XML counterpart of H75; we split 
this up because HTML - being based on SGML - does not know the concept of 
wellformedness.

Regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:13:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:46 GMT