W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:01:33 -0400
Message-ID: <028d01c66e1a$d403ed30$e29a968e@WILDDOG>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Johannes Koch'" <koch@w3development.de>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>


> So if something fails a technique - you cannot say anything about
> conformance to WCAG 2.0 beyond...
>
What must occur before you can you state that content does NOT conform? Are 
there any circumstances?

Chris

Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 19:02:07 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Chris Ridpath: "Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey"
Previous message: John M Slatin: "RE: Commenting on WCAG 2.0 last call draft"
In reply to: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey"
Next in thread: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey"
Reply: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) *wkey"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:46 GMT