I submitted a post [1] in an attempt to complete an action item, from the 10 November 2005 WCAG WG teleconference, re: a new G2.3 success criterion (SC) that addresses the provision of alternative equivalent content (issue). I believe this issue was to be deferred for consideration until the next version of WCAG, but I didn't want to let the issue (or possibly the action item?) expire on January 5. Should I submit a bugzilla entry re: this issue? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0582.html provision of alternative content for G2.3At 02:51 PM 12/22/2005 -0600, you wrote: > > >We just noted that we have been generating action items at each meeting >but never following up. Most are done or overcome by events (no longer >apply due to changes in documents since they were originally issued). > > > >Starting with the new year we will begin Action Item tracking. Also all >action items will have a deadline. If not done they will be reassigned >or expire. If issue is still there we can take a new action item. > > > >If you have any action items that are still active - please send them to >us so we can put them in. All other action items will expire on Jan 5th >and we will start from there. > > > >Thanks much > > >Gregg + John > >------------------------ > >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. >Director - Trace R & D Center >University of Wisconsin-Madison ><<http://trace.wisc.edu/>http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 >For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ > ><http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/> > > > >Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 14:14:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:41 GMT