W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:58:33 -0600
Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B02C12F00@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "Becky Gibson" <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Thanks for clarification, Gregg.

This should be an action item for the editors-- to clarify the wording
that specifies which techniques/combinations are sufficient.

John

"Good design is accessible design."

Dr. John M. Slatin, Director 
Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin 
FAC 248C 
1 University Station G9600 
Austin, TX 78712 
ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu 
Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility 



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:46 PM
To: 'Becky Gibson'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call



Hmmmm

Yes that needs to be clearer.

It is the UPPER list that is the 'sufficient' list.  The upper list then
refers to the lower lists of technology specific techniques.  Often the
lower are part of an AND statement.  In that case the lower are not
sufficient in themselves.  They must be used in conjunction with the
ANDed item above.  


 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Becky Gibson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:31 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call


I have a clarification question about sufficient techniques.   In the
How 
to meet document when the phrase, "The following combinations of
techniques are deemed to be sufficient by the WCAG Working Group to meet
success criterion N.N.N" is followed by a list of general and also a
list of technology specific techniques, I assume that only one of the
techniques from either list is necessary for last call.  Is this
correct? 

Several success criteria have a general techniques that state,  "Using
technology-specific standard techniques for," followed by some general
description of the technology specific techniques listed in the How to
Meet document.  We should have some consistent wording for the first
part of each technique.  And, is this really a general technique that
needs a formal technique document and tests? 

thanks,

Becky Gibson
Web Accessibility Architect
                                                       
IBM Emerging Internet Technologies
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101
Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2005 20:58:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:41 GMT