W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity as a technique

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:36:40 +0100
To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'Yvette Hoitink'" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006f01c5e3b9$74fc16a0$0200a8c0@rsnbiwa>

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 4:51 PM
To: 'Yvette Hoitink'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Validity as a technique

Several people have made this point - and it seems to indicate that validity
testing would be a very good tool to use in achieving the goal of
'programmatically determined'. 
Roberto Scano:
Yes, this is the point. If we talk about "programmatically determinated",
validity is important both for text/html and application/xhtml+xml.

IMHO is clear that IWA/HWG is against GL 4.1 removal.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 16:37:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC