W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: applicability conditions

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:36:50 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Good job - my only (minor) questions are:

(1) Given the definition of "feature" in WCAG2.0 Glossary [1] ("specific 
component of a technology"), what exactly does it mean for a technique to 
be "applicable" to a component of a technology?

(2) Components may be included in one version of a technology, but not 
another, which would seem to be to increase complexity and variability - 
how can such complexity and variability be effectively managed?

(3) Is a definition of "applicability" needed, such that it can be 
unambiguously (objectively) determined (measured) when applicability exists 
as opposed to when it doesn't, in reference to a technology feature?

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#glossary

  At 11:52 AM 9/2/2005 -0400, you wrote:

>I took an action item [1] to propose wording for the description of "when 
>does this technique work or not work" in the structure of documents 
>proposal [2].
>As I understood the discussion during the call, this point was intended to 
>address both the concept of "applicability condition" as we've discussed 
>in other calls of the techniques task force [1], as well as the indication 
>of baseline similar to what was in one of Becky's proposals [4].
>I think a way to cover these intents succinctly might be:
>"Indication of the technologies required by the technique, and technology 
>features for which the technique is applicable."
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/01-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02
>[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/01/12-wai-wcag-irc.html#T16-21-20
>--- Signature ---
>Michael Cooper
>Accessibility Product Manager, Watchfire
>1 Hines Rd Suite 200, Kanata, ON  K2K 3C7  Canada
>Tel: +1 (613) 599-3888 x4019
>Fax: +1 (613) 599-4661
>Email: michaelc@watchfire.com
>Web: http://www.watchfire.com/
Received on Friday, 2 September 2005 18:38:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:55 UTC