W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

RE: applicability conditions

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:06:52 -0500
To: "'Michael Cooper'" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, "'WAI GL \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050911210506.636391CC3F7@eq1.spamarrest.com>

Thanks Michael

I amended the proposed prototype to reflect this suggestion.  


 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Cooper
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:53 AM
To: WAI GL (E-mail)
Subject: applicability conditions

I took an action item [1] to propose wording for the description of "when
does this technique work or not work" in the structure of documents proposal

As I understood the discussion during the call, this point was intended to
address both the concept of "applicability condition" as we've discussed in
other calls of the techniques task force [1], as well as the indication of
baseline similar to what was in one of Becky's proposals [4].

I think a way to cover these intents succinctly might be:

"Indication of the technologies required by the technique, and technology
features for which the technique is applicable."


[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/01-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/01/12-wai-wcag-irc.html#T16-21-20

--- Signature ---

Michael Cooper
Accessibility Product Manager, Watchfire
1 Hines Rd Suite 200, Kanata, ON  K2K 3C7  Canada
Tel: +1 (613) 599-3888 x4019
Fax: +1 (613) 599-4661
Email: michaelc@watchfire.com
Web: http://www.watchfire.com/
Received on Sunday, 11 September 2005 21:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:56 UTC