W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: Words in place of optional

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:35:09 +0200
Message-ID: <42EDDEBD.4090400@ubaccess.com>
To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
CC: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>


Chris Ridpath wrote:

>>
> Just use the 3 levels. There's no need for the confusing category of 
> "optional".


Thanks Chris

That is the point I was trying to make.

Lisa

Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 07:36:37 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Boland: "[techs] What makes a good test?"
Previous message: Lisa Seeman: "Re: Challenges on JavaScript Techniques"
In reply to: Chris Ridpath: "Re: Words in place of optional"
Next in thread: Wendy Chisholm: "Re: Words in place of optional"
Reply: Wendy Chisholm: "Re: Words in place of optional"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:39 GMT