W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: additional note on techniques doc - no use of word "required"

From: Doyle-Work <dburnett@sesa.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:57:15 -0900
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BE5B48BB.5073%dburnett@sesa.org>



On 3/10/05 11:21 AM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:

> Here is another note to add to description of Techniques Doc in the
> Organization of WCAG Docs doc.
> 
> o        
> 
> * The word REQUIRED would not be used in the techniques document anywhere.
> (otherwise it starts to become normative).  Instead techniques would refer to
> the Success Criteria and define techniques that were felt to be Œsufficientš
> to meet the SC and thus would be ŒSafe Harbor˛.

Just a quick note.  Gregg, you are not implying/suggesting that we use the
term, Safe Harbor anywhere in the documents (techniques doc in particular)
are you?  

Doyle

Doyle Burnett
Education and Training Specialist
Multiple Disabilities Program
Special Education Service Agency
dburnett@sesa.org
Www.sesa.org
-- 



> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Gregg
> 
> ------------------------
> 
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> <http://trace.wisc.edu/ <http://trace.wisc.edu/> > FAX 608/262-8848
> For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/
> 
>   <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 23:01:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:36 GMT