W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

Possible format for techniques Doc.doc

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:19:05 -0600
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000219563777@spamarrest.com>

 Possible Format for techniques doc?


 


Techniques doc has two sections 


*    Reference Section

1.      Organized by Success Criterion

2.      With descriptions of implications for different technologies
(collapsible) 

*    Application Section

1.      Organized by activity  (e.g. creating forms, media, etc. )


 FORMAT of techniques in REFERENCE section


1.      Success Criterion

2.      Key words in SC (definition of key words)

3.      How SC criterion applies to the Following Technologies

*         Technology 1 (e.g. HTML)

*         Technology 2

*         (this list may collapse or have members dependent on user saying
that they are using or not using particular technology)

4.      Advisory Techniques  (not needed to conform to SC)

*         (may be mixed with #3 above but would need to be clearly marked as
ADVISORY techniques so they are not confused with those needed to conform to
SC) 

5.      Tests/test-methods to test for completion of the technique

*         These are links to tests for techniques (both SC related
techniques and ADVISORY techniques) 

2.       


FORMAT of techniques in APPLICATION section


1.      This is formatted to make it easy to understand how to do things
within a particular activity - such as designing online Forms. 

2.      Should be compatible with REFERENCE section - but would be different

 

 

 





Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 20:19:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:36 GMT