- From: Roberto Castaldo <r.castaldo@iol.it>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:46:49 +0100
- To: <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > I like Loretta's posting too. > > But I think we should consider keeping the plug in ref. people don't always > think of plug ins as user agents and we should not figure they will have > read another doc. Jason: Perhaps we should remove it from the success criterion but include it as an example in the informative material that follows the success criteria. Also, is there a better term than "plug-in" which would be more amenable to translation and more easily grasped by people who haven't heard of plug-ins? Roberto: What about "add-on" or "add-in"?
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 12:47:42 UTC