W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

R: Statement of Guideline 4.2 needs work

From: Roberto Castaldo <r.castaldo@iol.it>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:46:49 +0100
Message-ID: <41FFB1A4006AB5A7@ms003msg.mail.fw> (added by postmaster@fastwebnet.it)
To: <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > I like Loretta's posting too.
 > But I think we should consider keeping the plug in ref.  people don't
always  > think of  plug ins as user agents and we should not figure they
will have  > read another doc. 

Perhaps we should remove it from the success criterion but include it as an
example in the informative material that follows the success criteria. Also,
is there a better term than "plug-in" which would be more amenable to
translation and more easily grasped by people who haven't heard of plug-ins?

What about "add-on" or "add-in"?
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 12:47:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:52 UTC