Gregg Vanderheiden writes: > I like Loretta's posting too. > > But I think we should consider keeping the plug in ref. people don't always > think of plug ins as user agents and we should not figure they will have > read another doc. Perhaps we should remove it from the success criterion but include it as an example in the informative material that follows the success criteria. Also, is there a better term than "plug-in" which would be more amenable to translation and more easily grasped by people who haven't heard of plug-ins?Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 05:54:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT