W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: Statement of Guideline 4.2 needs work

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:52:50 +1100
Message-ID: <16929.24626.226678.915754@jdc.local>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > I like Loretta's posting too.
 > 
 > But I think we should consider keeping the plug in ref.  people don't always
 > think of  plug ins as user agents and we should not figure they will have
 > read another doc. 

Perhaps we should remove it from the success criterion but include it
as an example in the informative material that follows the success
criteria. Also, is there a better term than "plug-in" which would be
more amenable to translation and more easily grasped by people who
haven't heard of plug-ins?
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 05:54:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT