Chris, this looks OK to me. One suggestion: For XHTML documents served as text/html that *do* have both required attributes (lang and xml:lang), check to see if the value oflang= and xml:lang= are the *same* valid language code. I'm not sure what would happen if they were different, but I bet it's not pretty. John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: Chris Ridpath [mailto:chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:38 am To: Michael Cooper; WAI WCAG List Cc: John M Slatin Subject: Re: [techs] Fasttrack Tests I've modified test 49 to make it clear how you check for the proper lang attribute. Please take a look and let me know if this make sense to you: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test49.html Cheers, Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com> To: "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:07 PM Subject: RE: [techs] Fasttrack Tests > > We should follow the advice given at [1] > > * If the document is HTML, just use "lang" > * If the document is XHTML 1.0, or is any version of XHTML served as text/html, use both "lang" and "xml:lang" > * If the document is XHTML 1.1 or higher and served as application/xhtml+xml, just use "xml:lang" > > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/#ri20030218.131140352 >Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 16:47:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT