W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: G 2.1 and L3SC1 are no different?

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0411092241000.10811@aristotle.multipattern.com>

> I think the question was 'what are the salient differences', not why am 
> I top p osting...

Because you can't run your mail program?


> The phrases are nearly identical but the statement of purpose talks to 
> the fina l result, content _being_ keyboard accessible, and the SC talks 
> to the action o f the author in _designing_ the content to, hopefully, 
> achieve that result.

The content author knows nothing about the keyboards his or her readers 
use.


> Joe's point, that the author cannot guarantee the final outcome, is why 
> the SC doesn't speak to outcome but design.

They are not questions of Web content and should not be in WCAG. Clearer?

-- 

     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
     Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 22:42:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:32 GMT