W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 10 November 2004

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0411092236090.10811@aristotle.multipattern.com>

> * Continue discussion of contentious techniques [1]

Only three are marked contentious. That ranking is itself contentious. The 
contentious items seem *exceedingly* minor (who the hell needs a guideline 
about <address>?), and the table itself recapitulates the falsehood that 
WCAG 2 requires three priority levels.

It is interesting to note the results of a straw poll in which only the 
nobility got to vote. If you had the money to jet off to Dublin, you had a 
vote. Maybe this is a kind of head tax. I think it's *fascinating*.

> [1] [17]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/10/21-priority-voting.html

Wasn't there ever anything else posted to the list about the Dublin f2f? 
Something standard and universally done, like minutes?


     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
     Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 22:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:51 UTC