W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: Conformance Section with best practise proposal

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:52:11 +1100
Message-ID: <16784.34107.897133.91903@jdc.local>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "'Lisa Seeman'" <lisa@ubaccess.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > While I agree with your comments - I don't see how we can add anything to
 > conformance that is not a success criteria.   Conformance simply says that
 > you have met the SC at some level for some content.    

Gregg is correct here. If you want something to be included in WCAG
2.0 conformance claims, it has to become a success criterion, which
implies in turn that it has to be reliably testable. WCAG 2.0 does not
restrict whatever else authors may publicly state about the accessibility of
their content; but any such claims will not be part of the WCAG 2.0
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 08:53:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:51 UTC