Re: CSS Accessibility Analyzer from Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG on 2004-02-16 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2004)

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:00:18 +0100
To: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00c101c3f4bf$4334cad0$0300a8c0@iwars>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John M Slatin" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
To: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>; "WAI WCAG List"
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: CSS Accessibility Analyzer

I like the idea of including the browser-functionality information, but
as part of the goad to "realism" shall we also include figures on market
share? (Last time I checked, Opera had less than 1% of the browser
market; Netscape had just over 3%).

Roberto:
If we follow market, we need to suggest use of Flash (over 90%) instead
of SVG (less than 10%) :)

Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:01:37 UTC