W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: 1.1 suggestion

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:19:59 -0500 (CDT)
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406101318340.18034-100000@socrates.scdns.net>

> Secondly, if the description is "explicitly associated" with the
> non-text content,

We are going to need tighter phrasing than that. "Explicitly associated" 
could be interpreted to mean the addition of actual text on the page 
saying something like "Look at the bottom of the page for the description 
of this image," without a link. Sort of like people "marking" the language 
of text by writing "The following text is in Spanish."

I've never been wild about the presumed synonym "programmatically," but it 
could work here.

-- 

    Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
    Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
    Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:20:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT