W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: the the word "short" measurable

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:15:21 -0500
To: "'Roberto Castaldo'" <r.castaldo@iol.it>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000059198672@spamarrest.com>

This would apply to a passing bus. Which would be a short sound - but would
not be impulsive. 



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Roberto Castaldo
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 5:43 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: R: the the word "short" measurable

I think "short sound" may mean so many things... 

maybe we could try and explain what we're thinking about: do we mean
"impulsive sounds"? If so we'd better use the word "impulsive", as it is
quite self-explaining.

My best regards,

Roberto Castaldo
www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator
IWA/HWG Member
Mobile 348 3700161
Icq 178709294


Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per conto
di David MacDonald
Inviato: giovedý 3 giugno 2004 22.30
A: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Oggetto: the the word "short" measurable

Level 3 Success Criteria for Guideline 1.5 

1.	Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background
sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with
the exception of occasional short sounds. [V] 

Do we need to give a definition of “short” in Guideline 1.5 Level 3?



…Access empowers people...
           …barriers disable them…

                        www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com/>  

Received on Sunday, 6 June 2004 01:15:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:31 UTC