W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:14:53 -0500
Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A1E316B@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
To: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Help me out, Joe.  If suggesting that users check the URL is a good way
to help people confirm that they've arrived at the right place, doesn't
that impose a more intrusive requirement on content providers-- to
provide meaningful filenames?  How does that work when the pages *and*
the URLs are dynamically generated, and the URL contains a set of
variables and values rather than text that's meaningful to people?


"Good design is accessible design." 
Please note our new name and URL!
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/


 



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 12:03 pm
To: WAI-GL
Subject: Re: Action item: new examples for Guideline 3.1



> *        Example 1. A page title includes a phrase that appears in
link
> text in the navigation bar.
> 
> The phrase "Compliance checking" appears as a link in a navigation 
> bar. The same phrase is included in the <title> element of the linked 
> page, so users can be certain that the link has worked correctly.

What in the world is this all about? Suddenly we have to duplicate
<title> in an <a> somewhere? This is not the way to enable "users [to]
be certain that the link has worked correctly." I mean, check your URL
or something, why don'tcha?

We can use whatever title we want for a document and whatever text we
want 
in a link. It's author's choice, and the author will do what he or she 
feels right. There are better and worse practices, but it is ridiculous 
to think that authors must be *forced* to use the <title> of whatever 
they're linking to. What if the destination of the link is a crappy
page, 
possibly with *no* <title>?

We also have the title *attribute* for the <a> element which, along with
link text, can add much more richness and usable meaning than this
pie-in-the-sky hypothesis.

-- 

    Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
    Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
    Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:14:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT