W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: D-links (was Conformance Testing Proposal)

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:27:05 -0400
Message-ID: <001d01c41d6d$2f29b600$b040968e@WILDDOG>
To: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

I think we can all agree that the d-link has got to go. It's an ugly kludge
that was used because the longdesc was not supported.

It currently does serve a purpose but, with the longdesc getting more
support, it's becomming useless.

Do we dump it now or wait another year or two?

If kept for a short while, would it be a priority 3?

Received on Thursday, 8 April 2004 09:27:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:48 UTC