It is interesting. Dan brickley wrote a bit of ruby code to do something like this to whatever text you feed it. might be interesting to use it in conjunction with UBAccess' tools for presenting text. There seem to be different ways of mixing things that cause more or less problems, and they seem to mirror the way that some people perceive plain text anyway. (I think that my problems in typing the letters in order are different again...) cheers Chaals On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Kerstin Goldsmith wrote: >Amazing, really, considering our discussions about different cognitive >abilities (why do we call them disabilities, really?), that I could >completely read this without <idiom> blinking an eye </idiom>. > >Ah, the human brain. > >-Kerstin > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
attached mail follows:
Subject: research Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a ttoal mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 12:35:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:55:34 GMT