> Please be more constructive in your comments. If you have insight, > enlighten us. There's nothing to be more constructive *about*; WCAG WG continues to flub the issue of colour deficiency because it refuses to do proper research. > > The book's been out since October 2002... > > > Please review the mailing list guidelines, especially regarding soliciting. > [17]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/#mailing-list Please explain how pointing to a free resource constitutes soliciting. > > I can also forward the text to the list. In any event, use it to > > improve your guidelines. > > Please summarize your suggestions for colour usage. Please do your own research first. Memo to WAI (sic): I *have* contributed to this issue by writing an authoritative book chapter on the subject. WAI and WCAG WG are merely resistant to reading the prior art. A lot of this stuff has been covered before. Go read it. Sorry. *Please* go read it. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ <http://joeclark.org/access/> | <http://joeclark.org/book/>Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 00:03:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:51:03 GMT