- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:56:19 +0100
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
i have been wondering for some months now why it is that GL is just not appealing. Today it occurred to me that whilst the old habit of referring to WCAG 1.3a-2002 was dying the death at last; the subject lines were still more or less unintelligible. That is compared to other mailing lists, rather than absolutely Recent ones which are not exceptional include: Gateway Techniques refresh Summary of tables REF 2.4b -a second required success criteria well there has to be one REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words spoke too soon compare with IG AbilityNet: UK Airlines shamed in web accessibility survey "Universal" icons Re: Accessible Development Methodologies well maybe not NY Times: White House E-Mail System Becomes Less User-Friendly The RNIB replies to web design criticism Decorators with keyboards Do others agree? Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 08:52:29 UTC