W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: [#293] Summary for tables

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:25:24 +0200
Message-ID: <005f01c3502a$cde1c640$0100a8c0@rscano>
To: "Chris Brainerd" <Chris.Brainerd@cds.hawaii.edu>, "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

me too...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Brainerd" <Chris.Brainerd@cds.hawaii.edu>
To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>; "WAI WCAG List"
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 11:39 PM
Subject: RE: [#293] Summary for tables


>
> I concur.
>
> Chris Brainerd
> Instructional Designer
> Real Choices ACCESS
> Center on Disability Studies
> University of Hawaii
> Chris.brainerd@cds.hawaii.edu
> 808-956-9356
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Ridpath [mailto:chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:27 AM
> To: WAI WCAG List
> Subject: Re: [#293] Summary for tables
>
>
>
> > Layout tables should have a summary of "".
> >
> I agree that all tables should have a summary. But, is it not helpful
> for some layout tables to have a summary that describes their layout?
> Would people with cognitive impairments find this helpful? Would some
> screen reader users find this helpful?
>
> I believe that we've now reached a point in our discussions where user
> agents and checking tools can reliably determine the table purpose. User
> agents can then have an option of giving the user the layout table
> summaries or not.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 04:25:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:51:03 GMT