W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: Review Draft: "Additional notes"

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:24:36 -0500
Message-ID: <B3DC65CD2AA7EF449E554548C6FE1111E0A6C3@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
OK. Suggestion withdrawn!
John
 
 

John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/> 



-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] 
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:53 am
To: John M Slatin; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Review Draft: "Additional notes"



John wrote

Would it make sense to rename the new "Additional Notes" "Additional
Recommendations"?

 

 

Hmm

That would make all the success criteria "recommendations"

 

Also "Recommendation" is what W3C calls its standards.

 

So I don't think that works.   It promotes these to the same level as
the success criteria - and they are completely different. 

 

 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of John M Slatin
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:11 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Review Draft: "Additional notes"

 

Would it make sense to rename the new "Additional Notes" "Additional
Recommendations"?

 

John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/> 

 
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 09:24:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:25 GMT