W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:07:33 -0500
Message-ID: <B3DC65CD2AA7EF449E554548C6FE1111E0A5E1@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Maybe "large blocks of repetitive material" (instead of "text")?

John

John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@wiscmail.wisc.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:24 am
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria



Hmmmm

Good catch again.

Maybe something like 

"large, repetitive blocks of text (e.g. Page Headers) or links (e.g. nav bars)....."

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: John M Slatin [mailto:john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Ben Caldwell; gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria

Other things that people who can see pages basically ignore and that people who use screen readers would *like* to be able to ignore are header materils (with or without links) that appear at the top of each page-- this can be especially important if the header material includes one or more Flash movies, as seems increasingly common.

John

John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Caldwell [mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:56 pm
To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria



Have been looking at how our latest draft maps to other guidelines today and suggest that we extend this one a bit to include other types of content that should be skipped. How about:

#2 Users are able to skip over blocks of links that are greater than 7 (e.g. navigation bars, link lists, etc.) and non-readable text (e.g. ASCII art, lists of URIs, code samples, etc.) when reading with a synthesizer or when navigating using keyboard.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:56 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria

REF 2.4b
 
Suggest a second required success criteria for success of this extended checkpoint.
 
"#2 Users are able to skip over navigational bars or other blocks of links that are greater than 7 when reading with a synthesizer or navigating using keyboard.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2003 14:07:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:25 GMT