W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

changes available (was: Re: [techs] Techniques requirements ready for TR)

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 20:52:37 -0500
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030205204731.011633d8@localhost>
To: "WAI GL \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

The latest is at (URI hasn't changed):
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/sources/wd-wcag2-tech-req

Roberto's comments were incorporated (minutes after receiving them... :)

Anyone else have comments?  If not, it will go to TR on Friday.  The 
publication request went through today so we're getting closer...

Best,
--wendy



At 03:13 PM 2/5/2003, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:

>Roberto,
>Those look like reasonable clarifications to make.
>Thanks,
>--wendy
>
>At 01:22 PM 2/5/2003, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote:
>
>>At point 3.4 the title is:
>>
>>Relation to WCAG
>>
>>and in the document there is not a reference about what is WCAG.
>>I think that for make more "clear" the documentation, we need to make these
>>two changes:
>>
>>1) add the (WCAG 2.0) near the first phrase so there is officially a
>>"reference" to the acronym used in the text):
>>The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) creates a
>>technology-independent set of Web accessibility guidelines by providing a
>>set of high-level guidelines, and providing technology-specific information
>>in auxiliary documents that are more frequently updated and may be
>>non-normative.
>>
>>
>>2) change the text where is wrote WCAG into WCAG 2.0:
>>
>>a) introduction, at third paragraph:
>>Developers of non-W3C technologies may use the schema to publish their own
>>techniques documents that show how to use their technologies to conform to
>>WCAG 2.0.
>>
>>b) title in 3.4 with the follow title:
>>Relation to WCAG 2.0
>>
>>c) First point in 3.4:
>>Each technique must map to a specific WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion or
>>Additional Idea by URI and number for clarity and to enable auto generation
>>of hybrid Guidelines/Techniques documents.
>>
>>
>>I think that's all folks :)
>>Roberto
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
>>To: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; "Michael Cooper"
>><michaelc@watchfire.com>; "WAI GL (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:03 PM
>>Subject: Re: [techs] Techniques requirements ready for TR
>>
>>
>>Hello Roberto,
>>
>>It is not a mistake.  We removed it for the following reasons:
>>
>>1. WCAG 2.0 was the only reference in that section.
>>
>>2. There were several places in the document where we directly linked to an
>>external resource. WCAG 2.0 was the only one that we had an indirect link
>>to  (i.e., instead of linking directly to WCAG 2.0 in the text, we linked
>>to a target in the references section and then the target linked to the
>>external WCAG 2.0 resource). Instead, we now directly link to all of the
>>resources throughout the document.
>>
>>Is this an issue that you feel needs to be fixed?  If so, does it need to
>>be fixed before moving to TR?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>--wendy
>>
>>At 12:48 PM 2/5/2003, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Michael,
>> >i see that the point 6 has been removed:
>> >
>> >6 References
>> >WCAG2
>> >Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, B. Caldwell, W. Chisholm, J.
>> >White, G. Vanderheiden. World Wide Web Consortium, 25 January 2001, revised
>> >22 August 2002.
>> >
>> >
>> >is this a mistake?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>
>> >To: "WAI GL (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:29 PM
>> >Subject: [techs] Techniques requirements ready for TR
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >At the teleconference last Thursday we agreed on some final edits needed
>> >before posting the Techniques Requirements draft [1] to the TR page. We
>>have
>> >also discussed this with Judy Brewer and made a few additional edits.
>>Please
>> >review the draft to see if there are any burning issues. If we don't
>>receive
>> >objections we will post this to TR on Friday.
>> >
>> >Michael
>> >
>> >[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/sources/wd-wcag2-tech-req.html
>> >
>> >Michael Cooper
>> >Accessibility Project Manager
>> >Watchfire
>> >1 Hines Rd
>> >Kanata, ON  K2K 3C7
>> >Canada
>> >+1 613 599 3888 x4019
>> >http://bobby.watchfire.com/
>>
>>--
>>wendy a chisholm
>>world wide web consortium
>>web accessibility initiative
>>http://www.w3.org/WAI/
>>/--
>
>--
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/
>/--

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/-- 
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 20:51:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:21 GMT