W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Hebrew vowels and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:24:56 +1000
Message-ID: <15790.26056.948938.29356@jdc.local>
To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
CC: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Lisa Seeman writes:
 > I am suddenly getting more feedback on the vowels issue on a local level,
 > and we may even have some more interest form user agents offering support.
 > I would like to gain more consciences on a local level on what priority
 > level the success criteria should attain, and report back to the group.
 > Is this OK? Are there any objection to reopening the issue of priority level
 > for this success criteria?

This is a good idea; the input might be quite valuable. Since the
issue was never closed, it therefore remains open.
 > What time frame do we have for resolving this issue?

How long do you think it will take to pursue your inquiries? After
that, we can bring the issue to a meeting and either resolve it, or
establish any further action items that might be needed. Members of
the W3C's internationalization working group may also wish to
contribute at some point (as Wendy noted at one of our meetings, they
have an interest in various aspects of the guidelines, with this issue
being one of them).

The absolute requirement is that all issues be resolved before we
proceed to last call. However, it would also be desirable to obtain
some implementation experience before then.

Thus if you have a preliminary indication of how long these valuable
inquiries will take, we can schedule further treatment of the issue at
an appropriate meeting thereafter. My suggestion would be that you
post your findings to the list once the inquiries are concluded, and
that the issue should then be placed on a meeting agenda.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 03:25:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:42 UTC