W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2002

Hebrew vowels and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:55:02 -0700
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Cc: serf@zahav.net.il
Message-id: <003701c27556$4f45d8d0$7200000a@patirsrv.patir.com>

I am suddenly getting more feedback on the vowels issue on a local level,
and we may even have some more interest form user agents offering support.
I would like to gain more consciences on a local level on what priority
level the success criteria should attain, and report back to the group.
Is this OK? Are there any objection to reopening the issue of priority level
for this success criteria?
What time frame do we have for resolving this issue?

All the best,

Lisa Seeman

UnBounded Access

Widen the World Web


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:09 PM
To: Colette Nicolle
Cc: 'w3c-wai-gl@w3.org'
Subject: RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

Hi Collette,

there is a W3C policy that requests people do not send attachments in
such as Word (since not everyone has access to software that can read it,
among other reasons) to mailing lists. More to the point, I don't have Word,
but am interested in your comments.

Would you be able to copy them and paste the text into a plain email, or
them as an HTML file or a pointer to where they are available on the Web?


Charles McCN

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Colette Nicolle wrote:

>Dear Wendy,
>I am attaching some comments on WCAG 2.0 (put together by my colleague
>Poulson with also some input from myself) which I hope the working group
>will be useful.  The WWAAC project is working on specific success criteria
>and advisory recommendations for making the content understandable for
>people with communication or cognitive impairments, and I hope we can give
>you more input at a later date.
>Best wishes from a very wet and windy Loughborough,
>Colette Nicolle
>Research Fellow
>Ergonomics and Safety Research Institute (ESRI)
>Loughborough University
>Holywell Building
>Holywell Way
>Loughborough, Leicestershire
>LE11 3UZ
>Direct Dial: +44 (0)1509 283369
>Email: c.a.nicolle@lboro.ac.uk
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org]
>> Sent: 21 September 2002 02:27
>> To: Colette Nicolle; Doeko Hekstra; Bengt Farre
>> Subject: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft
>> Dear Colette, Doeko, and Bengt,
>> I'm sure Bengt has informed you of the latest working draft,
>> but I wanted
>> to pass along a form letter to encourage review and response by the
>> WWAAC.  I enjoyed our meeting this summer and look forward to future
>> discussions.
>> The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG
>> WG) at W3C has
>> recently published an updated Working Draft of "Web Content
>> Accessibility
>> Guidelines 2.0" (WCAG 2.0). It is available at:
>>          http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-WCAG20-20020822/
>> We'd be very interested to know your thoughts on this draft.
>> Some of the
>> questions you might want to comment on include:
>>          1.  In general, is this WCAG 2.0 Working Draft easy to
>> understand?  Please identify sections or phrases that are
>> difficult to
>> understand.  Please suggest alternative wording for us to consider.
>>          2.  The priority structure of this WCAG 2.0 Working
>> Draft differs
>> from WCAG 1.0.   Is this structure easy to understand?  Would
>> it be effective?"
>>          3.  If your site already uses WCAG 1.0, do you think
>> it would be
>> difficult to migrate from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0? What would make it
>> easier?  Please note that supporting documents, such as
>> technology-specific
>> techniques documents, are not yet available.
>> Please send your comments by October 18, 2002, to:
>>          w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>> The archive for that mailing list is available at:
>>          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/
>> There is also a "Requirements for WCAG 2.0" document on which you are
>> invited to comment. The Requirements document explains the
>> changes that the
>> Working Group is trying to make in WCAG 2.0 based on feedback
>> from WCAG
>> 1.0, including improving the usability, understandability, and
>> applicability of the guidelines. It is available at:
>>        http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-req/
>> While we expect WCAG 2.0 to go through several additional
>> drafts, comments
>> at this stage of development of the document are likely to
>> have more impact
>> on the document. Additional information on the Working Group
>> is available at:
>>          http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/
>> When sending comments, please:
>>          - State the issue as clearly and simply as possible.
>>          - Provide links to specific examples or references.
>>          - Suggest solutions if possible.
>>          - Remember that we welcome volunteers to help with the work.
>> When waiting for responses to comments:
>>         - Track your issue in the open issues list
>>         - Follow up on the mailing list if you don't find
>> your issue in the
>> open issues list.
>>          http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag20-issues.html
>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Many thanks in
>> advance for
>> your comments,
>>   - Wendy Chisholm, W3C
>>     Team Contact for the WCAG WG
>> --
>> wendy a chisholm
>> world wide web consortium
>> web accessibility initiative
>> seattle, wa usa
>> /--
>> --
>> wendy a chisholm
>> world wide web consortium
>> web accessibility initiative
>> seattle, wa usa
>> /--

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI
 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia  fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 07:55:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:42 UTC