W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:41:29 -0400
To: "'john_slatin'" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>, "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'Avi Arditti'" <aardit@voanews.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000401c24fb5$a5079e50$771bfea9@GV6101>


Is listing language specific methods more a techniques issue?

We do have to make sure our guidelines and checkpoints make sense across
languages though.



Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace, Univ of Wis


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of john_slatin
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:59 PM
To: 'Charles McCathieNevile'; Avi Arditti
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: 4.1 proposal for discussion

I agree with Charles-- I think it would be very helpful for us to
lists of specific recommended practices, with references to the
for which they're suitable.

I'd olke to see those lists in the Advice section, however, with the
Criteria stating more general principles and then pointing to the advice
section.  This is a practice we've followed elsewhere in 2.0.


John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C, Mail code G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:43 pm
To: Avi Arditti
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: 4.1 proposal for discussion

I am not suggesting that there is a problem of listing things that are
specific to one language. I think it is sensible to do that. My opinion
that we should do it, and we should be clear about what languages things
useful for (so that nobody tries to apply rules for english to hebrew
they are not applicable).



On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Avi Arditti wrote:

>Update: I am seeking feedback from a few big guns (non-technical
>appelation) in the field of plain language and will report back as soon

>as I get answers.
>The issue in debate is the wisdom of listing elements that might seem 
>weighted too heavily toward one language versus listing universal 
>principles that might seem too weak to enforce across all languages.
>Any more thoughts from the list?
>Finally, I would appreciate any help from list members in Italy to 
>translate elements of advice posted at the site for the Italian 
>government's new plain-language campaign: 

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409
136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI
http://www.w3.org/WAI  21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22  W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia
Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 19:43:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:42 UTC