W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: comment on 29 August meeting

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 04:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0208260403530.3089-100000@tux.w3.org>

On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Lisa Seeman wrote:

>
>My two cents worth,
>
>I like seperating them. Yes there is overlap, but the seperation brings
>clarity.
>There are two disitict tasks that need to be done, and they may overlap
>somtimes, but even when the stucturing of a document does not make it more
>readabnle for cognitive disabilties  - it still needs to be done, for
>distinc and important resons.

[snip]
>I think 3.1 will stand a better chance if it goes it alone.

Agreed. These are related in the same way that all checkpoints are
related, but they are different in terms of implementation. They also serve
different (albeit overlapping) audiences.

So it makes no sense to me that they be combined - this is a bit like
combining textual equivalents and direct accessibility of interactive
content.

cheers

Chaals
Received on Monday, 26 August 2002 04:09:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT