W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: ftf in Linz success criteria

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:33:50 -0000
Message-ID: <013201c22cbc$a88ecd80$ca969dc3@emedia.co.uk>
To: "Lisa Seeman" <seeman@netvision.net.il>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Lisa Seeman:

> -supply an illustration for each instruction
> - create a non text equivalent for all textual content.

Are these two equivalent? (well the second contains the first.)

Do you have a definition of what an "instuction" is?

How many "non-text equivalents" should you include for each text-content?
ie is including just audio sufficient, if so why? if not how many
equivalents do we provide?

Is there a summary of discussion at the f2f to avoid us having to go over
well discussed topics?

> let the debate begin......


Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2002 07:37:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:42 UTC