W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: ftf in Linz success criteria

From: jonathan chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:55:53 +0100
Message-ID: <001401c2305b$1457c9d0$723f29d9@RJCHETWYND>
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, "Lisa Seeman" <seeman@netvision.net.il>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Undoubtedly some of the creation of non-text equivalents might be created by
user agents, much as screen-readers currently do.

In the meantime, there are very good reasons for asking authors to provide
resources they may have available.

jonathan chetwynd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
To: "Lisa Seeman" <seeman@netvision.net.il>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: ftf in Linz success criteria


>
> Lisa Seeman:
>
> > -supply an illustration for each instruction
> > - create a non text equivalent for all textual content.
>
> Are these two equivalent? (well the second contains the first.)
>
> Do you have a definition of what an "instuction" is?
>
> How many "non-text equivalents" should you include for each text-content?
> ie is including just audio sufficient, if so why? if not how many
> equivalents do we provide?
>
> Is there a summary of discussion at the f2f to avoid us having to go over
> well discussed topics?
>
> > let the debate begin......
>
> :-)
>
> Jim.
>
>
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2002 05:19:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT