W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: highlights from today

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 12:52:07 -0500
To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <013f01c20e4c$0ad7e6a0$076fa8c0@laptop600>


You'd think that after all that time we spent crafting it I could send
the right version out.

Jason I absolutely correct.   Just was in too much of a hurry to get
them out before I forgot it all... and was sloppy.

We are updating the Highlights page.   Apologies everyone.


Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace,  Univ of Wis


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason White [mailto:jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:36 AM
> To: GV@trace.wisc.edu
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: highlights from today
> I thought the final resolution was:
> Write as clearly and simply as is [appropriate/possible] for the
> purpose of the content.
> This formulation took account of John's point, namely that the
> "content" is not some abstract meaning that exists independently of
> the words used, but is intimately connected with those words
> themselves.
> As I remember, no one on the teleconference objected to this, at least
> as a provisional formulation.
Received on Friday, 7 June 2002 13:52:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:41 UTC