W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Incomplete sentence

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204260235440.29422-100000@tux.w3.org>
Specifically not specificy.

I would suggest the final sentence as

  This can be done using text on the page, or through the use of metadata
  (EARL [reference] is an example technique).

Also, it isn't just recommended, it is required for level 2 conformance.

And can the information be provided in user-readable format on a different
page? Does there need to be an explicit linkage? (level-2 conformant Mobile
phone content will not, I hope, have its WCAG conformance information in the



On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

  The last sentence in the new WCAG 2.0 in the conformance section  is
  acatually a sentence fragment.    The sentence as intended is written
  below.   I am posting to the list for discussion before adding to the

  3. It is possible and recommended that sites report specificy which
  criteria they have met within each of the guidelines and checkpoints.
  This can be done using explicit text on the page or RDF/EARL (or other
  Metadata approach?).
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 02:39:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:41 UTC