W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

20 December 2001 WCAG WG Minutes

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:59:28 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011220175626.025ab6e0@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/12/20-minutes.html

Summary of actions, resolutions, issues
       Resolved: move forward on 2 day meeting after CSUN (23/24 March) 
       Unresolved: not sure where to meet after March. Suggestion is in conjunction with ASSETS in Scotland July 8-10 2002. 
       Action GV: write a proposal for 2.4 by the end of the week. 
       Issue: We came up with several categories of interactions that require timed responses. Will we include these in the Guidelines/Checkpoints or in Techniques? 
       Next meeting is 3 January. 

We had a good discussion about what types of things Checkpoint 2.4 might be applied to and what types of things should have exceptions. 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/12/20-minutes.html#examples-2-4

For example, time-outs on sites for security and privacy reasons are reasonable but people should be warned when time will expire and be offered a chance to reset the clock to give them more time. An exception would be purchasing ticktes where there is a limited pool to choose from. Another thing we decided not to address was tests where time is an important factor. For example, a timed test to qualify to be a real-time captioner. Time is an important aspect of that job. Tests in general are a complex topic and one that we do not think we will directly cover with 2.4. 



-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium 
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 18:00:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:17 GMT